The American officials gloated about their successful Osama bin Laden assassination raid and they didn't inform Pakistan in advance, fearing bin Laden could be tipped off.
The inflammatory comment suggests that Pakistan was not doing enough to fight alongside its U.S. ally against terrorists. The fact the hideout of Osama bin Laden is so close to a military facility raised suspicions that Pakistan was either harboring terrorists or just being too incompetent.
But in reality, with all the eyewitness testimonies from local news stations and some news reports, the Pakistan army was outside of the compound during the American raid.
Here's a report that settles the issue once and for all: Pakistan army knew about operation against Osama bin Laden
It makes sense why the Pakistani government was so slow in response to the public about their involvement right after the U.S. raid, and then it officially declared that the U.S. acted alone. It also explains why the Pakistani government and security have been mostly silent about what actually took place inside the compound.
Now, the cat is out of the bag.
We'll be seeing more news coverage on bin Laden raid from the side of Pakistan since the White House seems to be less forth-coming with answers.
Saturday 7 May 2011
Wednesday 4 May 2011
The ever-changing story of CIA op on killing bin Laden
It's really not necessary to remind everyone that Osama bin Laden has been dead for years. The credibility of the Obama's version of bin Laden being alive in Pakistan for years is zero.
The fact that the White House's story on "kill bin Laden operation" is changing day by day reaffirms that the operation was just another CIA staged performance.
As a typical CIA operation, it's shrouded in secrecy and it lacks evidence of proof that the man they shot was the REAL Osama bin Laden. The widely circulated image of the "dead" Osama bin Laden by the mainstream media has already been proven to be a fake.
Here are some discrepancies in stories that have surfaced:
- Obama's aides have suggested that the Navy Seal's orders were to either capture bin Laden or kill him.
Early version: The U.S. government states bin Laden "resisted" before he was shot. Bin laden had a gun in his hand but did not fire.
Later version: Bin Laden was not armed when he was shot.
Early version: Bin Laden was shot in the head.
Later version: Bin Laden was shot at least once in the face.
Eary version: Counterterrorism advisor John Brennan said a woman was killed who may have been used as a human shield by bin Laden.
Later version: Bin Laden's wife who rushed U.S. commandos was shot in the leg but not killed.
Pakistan version: One prisoner was taken alive, possibly the son of bin Laden.
U.S. version: Only the body of Osama bin Laden was taken but his family members were taken away by Pakistani authorities.
Pakistan version: One of the Blackhawk Apache helicopters was shot down.
U.S. version: Seal team blew up its own helicopter due to mechanical failure. 2 more Chinook helicopters flew in.
Now Obama says that his administration has the following proof of the dead bin Laden in the operation:
1. dead photos of bin Laden to be released soon (his skull was blown out)
2. video of sea burial of bin Laden to be released
3. DNA samples
Let's see the proof!!!
The fact that the White House's story on "kill bin Laden operation" is changing day by day reaffirms that the operation was just another CIA staged performance.
As a typical CIA operation, it's shrouded in secrecy and it lacks evidence of proof that the man they shot was the REAL Osama bin Laden. The widely circulated image of the "dead" Osama bin Laden by the mainstream media has already been proven to be a fake.
Here are some discrepancies in stories that have surfaced:
- Obama's aides have suggested that the Navy Seal's orders were to either capture bin Laden or kill him.
Early version: The U.S. government states bin Laden "resisted" before he was shot. Bin laden had a gun in his hand but did not fire.
Later version: Bin Laden was not armed when he was shot.
Early version: Bin Laden was shot in the head.
Later version: Bin Laden was shot at least once in the face.
Eary version: Counterterrorism advisor John Brennan said a woman was killed who may have been used as a human shield by bin Laden.
Later version: Bin Laden's wife who rushed U.S. commandos was shot in the leg but not killed.
Pakistan version: One prisoner was taken alive, possibly the son of bin Laden.
U.S. version: Only the body of Osama bin Laden was taken but his family members were taken away by Pakistani authorities.
Pakistan version: One of the Blackhawk Apache helicopters was shot down.
U.S. version: Seal team blew up its own helicopter due to mechanical failure. 2 more Chinook helicopters flew in.
Now Obama says that his administration has the following proof of the dead bin Laden in the operation:
1. dead photos of bin Laden to be released soon (his skull was blown out)
2. video of sea burial of bin Laden to be released
3. DNA samples
Let's see the proof!!!
Tuesday 3 May 2011
NATO murdered Gaddafi's son
In a clear-cut article describing the illegal barbarian act of NATO going beyond its UN security council resolution, striking Gaddafi family compound with 3 missles, killing Gaddafi's youngest son, 29-year old Saif al-Arab and three grandchildren under 12 on April 30, 2011.
One of the participants in the NATO coalition attacks on Libya, British Prime Minister David Cameron said on Sunday that NATO's targeting policy in Libya is not about targeting "particular individuals", though it's obvious that NATO has made a second attempt to kill Gaddafi. The first attempt was on April 25 when NATO warplanes bombed the residence of Gaddafi in Tripoli.
The United States, which led the attacks on Libya and later sent in predator drones in place of its military troops, has left NATO to continue its dirty war on Gaddafi. The White House spokesman Jay Carney ironically said "It is certainly not the policy of the coalition, of this administration, to decapitate, or to effect regime change in Libya by force."
No force? Hypocrisy indeed!!! What do you call going after the leader in his residence with air strikes!?!
Naturally, the African Union demanded NATO to stop targeting Libyan officials in their air raids.
Time to see the true colors of NATO and the U.S. and their motives for the illegal war on Libya!
One of the participants in the NATO coalition attacks on Libya, British Prime Minister David Cameron said on Sunday that NATO's targeting policy in Libya is not about targeting "particular individuals", though it's obvious that NATO has made a second attempt to kill Gaddafi. The first attempt was on April 25 when NATO warplanes bombed the residence of Gaddafi in Tripoli.
The United States, which led the attacks on Libya and later sent in predator drones in place of its military troops, has left NATO to continue its dirty war on Gaddafi. The White House spokesman Jay Carney ironically said "It is certainly not the policy of the coalition, of this administration, to decapitate, or to effect regime change in Libya by force."
No force? Hypocrisy indeed!!! What do you call going after the leader in his residence with air strikes!?!
Naturally, the African Union demanded NATO to stop targeting Libyan officials in their air raids.
Time to see the true colors of NATO and the U.S. and their motives for the illegal war on Libya!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)